Sunday, March 3, 2013

Google Hangouts receive sign language interpreter support, keyboard shortcuts

Google Hangouts receive sign language interpreter support, keyboard shortcuts

Video chat can be an empowering tool for hard-of-hearing internet citizens for whom sign language is easier than voice. Most chat software doesn't easily bring an interpreter into the equation, however, which spurred Google into adding a Sign Language Interpreter app for Google+ Hangouts. The web component lets chatters invite an interpreter that stays in the background while they verbalize hand gestures. Google is also helping reduce dependencies on the mouse for those who can't (or just won't) use one during chat: there's now keyboard shortcuts to start or stop chats, disable the camera and other basics that would normally demand a click. Both the interpreter app and shortcuts are available today.

Filed under: ,

Comments

Via: The Verge

Source: Anna Cavender (Google+)

Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/8yMtp9cCoTo/

bear grylls us news law school rankings gael glen rice jr bars lindzi cox bachelor finale

Political gridlock at budget-cuts deadline

Gridlocked once more, President Barack Obama and Republican congressional leaders refused to budge in their budget standoff Friday as $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts bore down on individual Americans and the nation's still-recovering economy. "None of this is necessary," said the president after a sterile White House meeting that portended a long standoff.

Obama formally enacted the reductions a few hours before the midnight deadline required by law. Yet their impact had been felt thousands of miles away well before then. In Seattle, the King County Housing Authority announced it had stopped issuing housing vouchers under a federal program that benefits "elderly or disabled households, veterans, and families with children."

The president met with top lawmakers for less than an hour at the White House, then sought repeatedly to fix the blame on Republicans for the broad spending reductions and any damage that they inflict. "They've allowed these cuts to happen because they refuse to budge on closing a single wasteful loophole to help reduce the deficit," he said, renewing his demand for a comprehensive deficit-cutting deal that includes higher taxes.

Republicans said they wanted deficit cuts, too, but not tax increases. "The president got his tax hikes on Jan. 1," House Speaker John Boehner told reporters, a reference to a $600 billion increase on higher wage earners that cleared Congress on the first day of the year. Now, he said after the meeting, it is time take on "the spending problem here in Washington."

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was equally emphatic. " I will not be part of any back-room deal, and I will absolutely not agree to increase taxes," he vowed in a written statement.

At the same time they clashed, Obama and Republicans appeared determined to contain their disagreement.

Boehner said the House will pass legislation next week to extend routine funding for government agencies beyond the current March 27 expiration. "I'm hopeful that we won't have to deal with the threat of a government shutdown while we're dealing with the sequester at the same time," he said, referring to the new cuts by their Washington-speak name.

Obama said he, too, wanted to keep the two issues separate.

Under the law, Obama had until midnight to formally order the cuts. Barring a quick deal in the next week or so to call them off, the impact eventually is likely to be felt in all reaches of the country.

The Pentagon will absorb half of the $85 billion required to be sliced between now and the end of the budget year on Sept 30, exposing civilian workers to furloughs and defense contractors to possible cancellations. Said Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, only a few days on the job: "We will continue to ensure America's security" despite the challenge posed by an "unnecessary budget crisis."

The administration also has warned of long lines at airports as security personnel are furloughed, of teacher layoffs in some classrooms and adverse impacts on maintenance at the nation's parks.

The announcement by the housing agency in Seattle was an early indication of what is likely to hit as the cuts take effect. It said it was taking the action "to cope with the impending reduction in federal funding," adding that it normally issues 45 to 50 vouchers per month.

After days of dire warnings by administration officials, the president told reporters the effects of the cuts would be felt only gradually.

"The longer these cuts remain in place, the greater the damage to our economy ? a slow grind that will intensify with each passing day," he said. Much of the budget savings will come through unpaid furloughs for government workers, and those won't begin taking effect until next month.

Obama declined to say if he bore any of the responsibility for the coming cuts, and expressed bemusement at any suggestion he had the ability to force Republicans to agree with him.

"I am not a dictator. I'm the president," he said. "So, ultimately, if Mitch McConnell or John Boehner say we need to go to catch a plane, I can't have Secret Service block the doorway, right?" He also declared he couldn't perform a "Jedi mind meld" to sway opponents, mixing Star Wars and Star Trek as he reached for a science fiction metaphor.

Neither the president nor Republicans claimed to like what was about to happen. Obama called the cuts "dumb," and GOP lawmakers have long said they were his idea in the first place.

Ironically, they derive from a budget dispute they were supposed to help resolve back in the fall of 2011. At the time, a congressional Supercommittee was charged with identifying at least $1.2 trillion in deficit savings over a decade as part of an attempt to avoid a first-ever government default. The president and Republicans agreed to create a fallback of that much in across-the-board cuts, designed to be so unpalatable that it would virtually assure the panel struck a deal.

The Supercommittee dissolved in disagreement, though. And while Obama and Republicans agreed to a two-month delay last January, there was no bipartisan negotiation in recent days to prevent the first installment of the cuts from taking effect.

It isn't clear how long they will last.

Of particular concern to lawmakers in both parties is a lack of flexibility in the allocation of cuts due to take effect over the next few months. That problem will ease beginning with the new budget year on Oct. 1, when Congress and the White House will be able to negotiate changes in the way the reductions are made.

For his part, Obama suggested he was content to leave them in place until Republicans change their minds about raising taxes by closing loopholes.

"If Congress comes to its senses a week from now, a month from now, three months from now, then there's a lot of open running room there for us to grow our economy much more quickly and to advance the agenda of the American people dramatically," he said.

"So this is a temporary stop on what I believe is the long-term, outstanding prospect for American growth and greatness."

But Republicans say they are on solid political ground. At a retreat in January in Williamsburg, Va., GOP House members reversed course and decided to approve a debt limit increase without demanding cuts. They also agreed not to provoke a government shutdown, another traditional pressure point, as leverage to force Obama and Democrats to accept savings in benefit programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

Obama has said repeatedly he's willing to include benefit programs in deficit-cutting legislation ? as long as more tax revenue is part of the deal.

"I am prepared to do hard things and to push my Democratic friends to do hard things," he said at the White House on Friday.

Republicans speak dismissively of such pledges, saying that in earlier negotiations, the president has never been willing to close a deal with the type of changes he often says he will accept.

???

Associated Press writers Robert Burns, Andrew Taylor, Jim Kuhnhenn and Darlene Superville in Washington and Manuel Valdes in Seattle contributed to this report.

Also Read

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/gridlock-no-budging-budget-cuts-deadline-212206507.html

Kitty Wells Marissa Mayer Jon Lord Colorado shootings dark knight rises Aurora shooting James Eagan Holmes

Stigmatizing, Censoring Talk of Sexuality in Technology | World of ...

Stigmatizing, Censoring Talk of Sexuality in TechnologyThe open source movement has long been about sharing information and code freely and openly. So it?s a little odd when a ?grassroots, open security conference? decides to censor a speaker it had invited to talk at one of its conferences.

The security conference, BSides SF, made the decision after a complaint was lodged against the talk by the Ada Initiative?s Valeria Aurora. The Ada Initiative is a group that works ?to increase the participation of women in open technology and culture by educating both women and people of all genders who want to support women in open tech/culture? and was co-founded by Mary Gardiner and Valerie.

Valeria Aurora?s complaint was lodged against Violet Blue?s talk entitled, ?sex +/- drugs: known vulns and exploits.? But rather than talking directly to the presenter to learn more about what the talk was going to be about, they brought their complaint to BSides SF?s organizer, Ian Fung.

In seeking to censor Violet Blue?s talk and add to the stigma of having open and frank discussions of sexuality, all that happened is that it amplified the controversy ? and left a lot of unanswered questions.

First, let?s clear up the premise that talk about sex and technology are two topics that can never occur together. Technology is shaping sexuality and changing the way people interact ? yes, even sexually ? with one another. With the advent of new generations of sex toys, virtual reality environments and worlds, and more, technology is impacting sexuality in ways we couldn?t imagine even just 20 years ago. The Internet has been used since its inception to exchange sexual imagery, open and frank discussion of sexuality and gender identity issues, and erotic stories (all the way back into the 1980s).

One component of sexuality in society ? pornography ? has driven some of the innovation in technology as well. Whether you agree with it or not, the porn industry has arguably been pushing the envelope of technology for secure and private payment systems, minor identification online (to prevent access), streaming video (long before YouTube), and more. To suggest that sexuality or discussion of sexual topics at a technology conference is inappropriate is equivalent to putting one?s head in the sand and ignoring the history of how these two subjects have long been intertwined.

The challenge becomes when a complaint about a conference topic turns into a specific action ? censorship ? based upon seemingly incomplete and/or faulty information, or one organization?s own agenda.

And after reading through the accounts of what happened (linked below), I?m amazed at the sheer lack of communication among a group of people who (at least partially) communicate for a living. Apparently Valeria Aurora never thought to speak directly to Violet Blue about her concerns. Ian Fung apparently never thought to have the two people who?s lives he was impacting sit across a table and simply talk to one another, like two human beings. At one point before the decision was made, they were all in the same room together, and could have simply talked it out like three reasonable adults.

Perhaps it was because the Ada Initiative didn?t appear to be interested in a compromise or an actual give-and-take discussion about the topic, as this email from Valerie appears to make clear:

This is total bullshit even if it somehow ends up giving an anti-rape, pro-consent message. Framing a talk about sex in the vocabulary of computer security does not magically make it on-topic, and it definitely doesn?t stop it from being a giant ?You are not welcome or even safe? sign for women.

In other words, even if Violet Blue?s topic was about harm reduction, the Ada Initiative seemed to believe that it was off-topic and inappropriate for the BSides conference (even though they had nothing to do with organizing the conference).

Now, most organizers would take such an opinion into consideration. But unless they had third-party data or some sort of consensus from attendees, I suspect most organizers wouldn?t simply cancel an invited speaker because of one person?s (or one organization?s) opinion.

Here?s the proposed talk that was censored from the BSides SF conference:

sex +/- drugs: known vulns and exploits

What drugs do to sexual performance, physiological reaction and pleasure is rarely discussed in ? or out of ? clinical or academic settings. Yet most people have sex under the influence of something (or many somethings) at some point in their lives.

In this underground talk, Violet Blue shares what sex-positive doctors, nurses, MFT?s, clinic workers and crisis counselors have learned and compiled about the interactions of drugs and sex from over three decades of unofficial curriculum for use in peer-to-peer (and emergency) counseling. Whether you?re curious about the effects of caffeine or street drugs on sex, or are the kind of person that keeps your fuzzy handcuffs next to a copy of The Pocket Pharmacopeia, this overview will help you engineer your sex life in our chemical soaked world. Or, it?ll at least give you great party conversation fodder.

I can understand why some people may read that description and be scratching their heads, ?What does this have to do with a security conference?? That?s something only the conference organizers can answer. But here are Violet Blue?s thoughts:

I have presented talks about sexuality at tech conferences all over the world, and I make it clear each time that my talks are not technical and that they are about issues that affect the culture to which I am presenting.

Indeed, it?s sort of a meta-discussion aimed at the people who are in the room. These kinds of meta-discussions about culture and people are not uncommon at technology conference. SXSWi is littered with them; other technology conferences are the same.

There?s a Time and Place to Talk About Sex? And This Isn?t It?

From reading the Ada Initiative?s perspective, it appears their argument is simple ? presentations like this can have an unintended chilling effect on women wanting to attend technology conferences such as BSides SF. Women who have experienced sexual trauma or rape can be triggered by such discussions. All of which may be true (at least from their perspective), to an extent.

The challenge, though, is that we don?t really know how much of an issue this really is for women attendees. We have heard anecdotal reports over the years of X, Y and Z, but no systematic research has been conducted. You can?t argue that something is harmful without having actual data to show it is true (well, you can, but it?s a pretty empty argument if you ask me).

Conferences should not be planned around sensitivities to legitimate topics of discussion. We cannot create a trigger-free world or environment for people with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or others who are sensitive to topics that they find difficult. It?s silly to try and do so. It stigmatizes the very topics that need to be discussed openly and without reserve.

I perk up my ears anytime someone or some organization claims that censorship is the answer to a self-proclaimed problem. Censoring talks like this one drives sexuality ? and inappropriate sexual behavior ? back into the dark. We have to talk openly about sexual issues ? even about sensitive topics like rape or sexual assault ? because it keeps these topics in the light.

Education is the key to understanding and change ? not censorship.

?

For Further Reading

Read Violet Blue?s account: What happened with my Security BSides talk

Read the Ada Initiative?s account: Clarification on the Ada Initiative?s role in the cancellation of Violet Blue?s BSides SF talk and their original description and explanation of what happened

Read BSides SF?s account: Clearing up a few points from Valerie and Violet?s account of the situation

Footnotes: John Grohol, PsyDDr. John Grohol is the CEO and founder of Psych Central. He is an author, researcher and expert in mental health online, and has been writing about online behavior, mental health and psychology issues -- as well as the intersection of technology and human behavior -- since 1992. Dr. Grohol sits on the editorial board of the journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking and is a founding board member and treasurer of the Society for Participatory Medicine.

Like this author?
Catch up on other posts by John M. Grohol, PsyD (or subscribe to their feed).



????Last reviewed: By John M. Grohol, Psy.D. on 1 Mar 2013
????Published on PsychCentral.com. All rights reserved.

APA Reference
Grohol, J. (2013). Stigmatizing, Censoring Talk of Sexuality in Technology. Psych Central. Retrieved on March 2, 2013, from http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2013/03/01/stigmatizing-censoring-talk-of-sexuality-in-technology/

?

Source: http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2013/03/01/stigmatizing-censoring-talk-of-sexuality-in-technology/

birdman whip it gabby giffords gabby giffords geithner gabrielle giffords juliette lewis

Saturday, March 2, 2013

PHOTOS: Hot Hollywood Couples!

Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone hold hands in NYC! Check out more pics of Hollywood's tightest twosomes

Source: http://www.ivillage.com/star-snapshots-celebrity-couples-photos-2012/1-b-469173?dst=iv%3AiVillage%3Astar-snapshots-celebrity-couples-photos-2012-469173

snooty fox el debarge portland weather clintonville battlestar galactica blood and chrome my morning jacket roger goodell

This Week in Review - Nieman Journalism Lab

nascar-youtube

:?We got a case study from the sports world in breaking news, citizen journalism, and copyright in the aftermath of a crash at a NASCAR race last weekend that injured more than a dozen fans. The Washington Post?s Erik Wemple has the blow-by-blow of what followed the crash: A fan posted a jarring video of the crash to YouTube, which quickly took down the video, ostensibly because of a copyright violation. YouTube reversed itself hours later and allowed the video back up.

NASCAR claimed that it asked YouTube to take the video down not because of copyright, but ?out of respect for those injured? in the accident. It was a rationale a NASCAR exec reiterated to Wemple?a few days later, insisting NASCAR had no problem with the video on copyright grounds and adding that it only goes after unofficial video that?s used commercially.

Regardless, the incident turned out to be an instructive moment regarding the legality of distributing fan video from sporting events, especially when it becomes a news event. Media law prof Chip Stewart explained to Poynter?s Al Tompkins?that though NASCAR tickets claim it owns all video shot at the event, it doesn?t have any legal right to claim copyright over others? documentation of news facts. Tompkins explored the issue further, tying it more broadly to fair use for news. The Knoxville News Sentinel?s Jack Lail also chastised NASCAR for its fair use overreach, as did Techdirt?s Mike Masnick, who lamented how easy it?s become to ?censor via copyright claims.?

Will Leitch of Sports on Earth hoped this case would finally lead to resolution of the thorny legal issue of fan video at sporting events, though Rackspace?s Robert Scoble and Forbes? John McQuaid argued that the problem is only going to get tougher as the ability to shoot video instantly?? particularly through cameras in glasses?? gets easier.

Lost Remote?s Cory Bergman was more appalled at YouTube than NASCAR, noting that it initially approved NASCAR?s takedown request while constantly denying governments? requests for the same thing. Mathew Ingram of paidContent warned that while YouTube eventually did the right thing, we?re only beginning to understand the implications of letting a handful of giant corporations control most of our online speech.

Aside from the legal aspect, Staci Kramer criticized NASCAR?s move as bad social media strategy, pointing out that it should have known that taking the video down would only make it blow up bigger. ?You can?t control the internet or social media. You only think you can,? she wrote. UNC?s John L. Robinson, meanwhile, used the incident to muse about the lack of courage among many young people hoping to go into journalism.

bradley-manning-wikileaks-billboard

: U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, the soldier who supplied WikiLeaks with the material for its biggest disclosures in 2010, pleaded guilty yesterday to 10 charges involved with providing the information to WikiLeaks, but pleaded not guilty to 12 other charges, including his most significant charge of ?aiding the enemy.? The charges to which he pleaded guilty carry a combined maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.

Manning also read in court a 35-page statement in which he described why and how he leaked the information to WikiLeaks, saying he did it to ?make the world a better place? and prompt a broader discussion about the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He also asserted that no one from WikiLeaks pressured him into sending information. The New York Times has a good summary of the statement, and in a couple of posts, The Guardian explained the state of the case against him. The Guardian?s Glenn Greenwald described Manning as a hero.

There was one other bombshell in Manning?s statement: He said he tried to contact the Times and The Washington Post about giving them the information before turning to WikiLeaks, leaving an unreturned voicemail at the Times? public editor?s number and talking briefly with a Post reporter. (He also wanted to try Politico, but was deterred by bad weather.) The public editor Manning probably called, Clark Hoyt, said he doesn?t remember hearing from him, and the Post?s Erik Wemple noted that it?s really difficult to just call the Times and leave a news tip.

Gawker?s Adrian Chen argued that Manning?s initial attempts to leak to the papers indicate that WikiLeaks? real value ?was not its state-of-the-art leaking technology but its accessibility to lowly Army Private who came out of nowhere with one of the biggest leaks in history,? though paidContent?s Mathew Ingram said Manning?s story shows the opposite?? that independent groups are needed to fill in the cracks among traditional outlets.

seattle-times-paywall

: There were a number of individual moves worth noting this week in the steady migration of digital content into the arena of paid, rather than free. The Seattle Times became the latest paper to announce a metered-model paywall, charging $3.99 a week for web and app access for non-print subscribers. GeekWire covered the plan?s basics, and the Times? top editor, David Boardman, wrote the column selling the change to readers.

Elsewhere, the Lab?s Justin Ellis went deep on The Boston Globe?s plans to tweak its two-site strategy by more clearly separating the free Boston.com from the paid BostonGlobe.com. There were also some developments in the move toward paid content among web-only outfits, too. App.net actually moved a bit in the opposite direction: It launched last year as a paid Twitter alternative, but is expanding to allow free accounts with limits on storage and number of follows, as Quartz?s Zachary Seward explained.

Andrew Sullivan reported on the progress of the new independent paywall at his blog, noting that 7.7% of the people who are clicking through a paid-content notice to read a full article are eventually subscribing. PaidContent?s Laura Hazard Owen offered Sullivan some suggestions about how to get the subscriptions to pick up again. And in other paid-content innovation, Rachel McAthy of Journalism.co.uk reported on a Dutch newspaper app that lets readers pay to subscribe to individual journalists.

: Here?s what else is going on during this slow week in media and tech:

? The New York Times announced that it will rename its Paris-based International Herald Tribune as The International New York Times. The Awl?s Ken Layne voiced his displeasure with the new name and waxed nostalgic for the IHT of old. Here at the Lab, journalism professor Nikki Usher noted that the IHT has a very distinct culture from the Times (it?s 143 years old, and the Times has only been its sole owner for 10 of them) that can?t be wiped away with a simple name change.

? A week after The New York Times Co. announced it was selling The Boston Globe, newspaper analyst Alan Mutter?explained?why publishers aren?t interested in the Globe (it has the same problems as other struggling metro dailies, and many key publishers are out of the running for other reasons, too), and the Lab?s Justin Ellis explored?how the Globe is handling its two-site free-paid strategy. On the Times? side, journalism professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen explained how the company is?moving beyond American journalism, especially the metro version of it. Reuters? Jack Shafer was skeptical about how successful that move will be.

? A big advance on the open-information front: The White House directed major research units?($100 million a year or more)?to begin planning to make the results of all federally funded projects free to the public. Nature?s Richard Van Noorden provided some of the background behind the order.

? Something to keep an eye on: In a long-rumored development, the Tribune Co., which recently emerged from bankruptcy, is reported to be beginning the process of trying to sell its newspapers, including the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune. Jim Romenesko speculated about who might buy the Times.

? We got a rare glimpse at the algorithm Google News uses to evaluate news sites and rank results last week thanks to a patent application filed by Google, reported by Computerworld.

? Here at the Lab, the University of Florida?s Matt Sheehan provided a sharp summary of the discussion about journalism education at the Journalism Interactive conference a few weeks back. Among the takeaways: J-schools need to adapt a more nimble mindset, teach remixing alongside creation from scratch, and focus on teaching students to teach themselves.

? Finally, Poynter has some good tips on one of the basics?? editing yourself as a reporter.

Photo of Bradley Manning billboard by savebradley used under a Creative Commons license.

Source: http://www.niemanlab.org/2013/03/this-week-in-review-nascar-and-online-free-speech-and-details-of-bradley-mannings-leak/

eric johnson big east tournament ashley olsen new apple tv sun flare love hewitt new ipad

UK manufacturing suffers shock contraction in February - PMI

LONDON (Reuters) - British manufacturing shrank unexpectedly in February and new orders dwindled, a survey showed on Friday, making it likely the sector will put a drag on economic growth in the first quarter.

The Markit/CIPS Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) fell to 47.9 from a downwardly revised 50.5 in January, confounding forecasts for a rise to 51.0. It was the first reading below the 50 line that separates growth from contraction since November.

In the last quarter of 2012, a plunge in factory output shaved 0.1 percentage point off economic growth, contributing to a drop in gross domestic product that brought Britain within sight of its third recession since the 2008 crisis.

"The return to contraction of the manufacturing sector is a big surprise and represents a major setback to hopes that the UK economy can ... avoid a triple-dip recession," said Chris Williamson, the Markit economist who compiled the survey.

"A strong rebound is needed in March to prevent the sector from acting as a drag on the economy as a whole in the first quarter."

On some measures, the chances of such a rebound look slim. The subindex for new orders fell to 46.6 in February, the lowest reading since July, as market conditions remained tough at home and abroad, especially in Europe. Backlogs of work also shrank sharply.

The manufacturing sector accounts for 10.5 percent of British economic output, according to the Office for National Statistics.

However, Williamson said there were good reasons to believe manufacturing could recover in March, noting that the weaker pound might help exporters, while factories were also hit by disruption to deliveries from bad weather in late January.

"The Chinese New Year holidays are having an increasingly disruptive impact on global trade flows ... and appear to have had a stronger than usual effect in February," he added.

Factory output fell last month at the fastest pace since October, with declines in the production of consumer goods and intermediate goods such as car engines, Markit said.

Some firms reported spare capacity, which was part of the reason for the fastest reduction in factories' workforces in well over three years.

But there was at least respite for hard-pressed manufacturers as input costs dipped for the first time since August.

(Editing by Hugh Lawson)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/uk-manufacturing-suffers-shock-contraction-february-pmi-093552708--business.html

Torrey Smith Brother fiona apple awkward awkward CJ Spiller tracy morgan Chase.com

Tunisia renews state of emergency amid crisis | Morocco World News

TUNIS, March 1, 2013 (AFP)

Tunisian President Moncef Marzouk extended by?three months on Friday a state of emergency in force since the 2011?revolution, as the country faces its worst crisis since the uprising.

The decision, taken after consultations with caretaker prime minister?Hamadi Jebali and National Convstitutent Assembly chief Mustapha Ben Jaafar,?extends the state of emergency until June 3, Marzouki?s office said.

The state of emergency has been in effectacross the north African country?since January 14, 2011, in the wake of the uprising that ousted veteran?strongman Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

?Since then, the measure has been renewed regularly, either on a?month-to-month basis or for three months at a time.

?Tunisia is facing a grave political crisis after the February assassination?of leftist politician Chokri Belaid, a vocal critic of the Islamist-led?government.

The killing sparked clashes between protesters and police and prompted the?largest anti-government demonstrations since the revolution.

On Thursday, the president testified in the murder probe of Belaid, as a?judicial source named the Salafist suspected of the assassination that plunged?the country into turmoil.

Jebali resigned after failing to forge a non-partisan government of?technocrats, after his ruling Islamist Ennahda party failed to back up his efforts to defuse the crisis.

Interior Minister Ali Larayedh has been tasked with forming a new cabinet?and must reveal the line-up by March 8.

In recent months, Tunisia has also been rocked by violence and attacks?blamed on the ultra-conservative Muslim Salafist movement. At the same time,?there have been protests sparked by growing unemployment and poverty ? the?key problems that triggered the 2011 revolution.

Source: http://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2013/03/80633/tunisia-renews-state-of-emergency-amid-crisis/

first day of spring mexico earthquake aziz ansari aziz ansari katherine jenkins peyton manning broncos mexico city earthquake